SurvyeUSA. 8/9-11. Likely voters. MoE 3.9% (X/XX results)
Dole (R) 46 (54)
Hagan (D) 41 (42)
This has almost tightened to where the race was right after the primary election, when Hagan got within 50-46 of Dole. Dole responded with a massive negative ad barrage, which knocked Hagan down a few points. Now, Hagan is up with her own barrage of ads, and she has taken a huge bite out of Dole's numbers.
The voter breakdown has 19 percent African American turnout. I've previously criticized polls (inluding our own) for using a voter screen far lower than the 26% African Americans notched per exit polls in 2004.
However, it turns out that those exit poll numbers were widely off. The pollsters at PPP, who are based in NC, explain the problem:
I've been using the 26% figure for our NC general election polling but the more I thought about it last night the more the 26% figure just didn't make sense. North Carolina's population is only about 19% black, and it would be pretty unusual for them to be represented at 26% in a general election.
So I e-mailed Gary Bartlett, the director of the extremely well run North Carolina Board of Elections, this morning and asked him for the demographic data on the 2004 electorate in North Carolina. It turns out the actual black electorate in the state that year was a little under 19%.
So the 19 percent SUSA is using is legit.
That said, I don't think there's any doubt that African American turnout this year will far exceed what we saw in 2004. I don't mind that pollsters use conservative voter screens based on historical results, but we're going to see some dramatic shifts in demographics, and North Carolina will dramatically change -- perhaps more so than any other state -- given its sizeable African American, student, and creative class populations.
On the web: Kay Hagan for Senate